Discussion on Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria

Discussion on Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria

Discussion on Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria

Question Description
Estimated length 1-2 pages; 50 points

Include:

Background/HistoryWhy was this systematic review completed? Why do we need this evidence analyzed.(5)
What was PICO question? (List as a question and define each component.Be sure to look at Powerpoint that discusses this; define your P,I,C and O)8 points; 2 point each component
Briefly discuss inclusion/exclusion criteria.What factors led to studies being excluded or included in this systematic review.(5)
Methods: Methods of studies included in the review (5)
Summarize results of research included in the systematic review.(5)
Could PICO question be definitively answered?Why or why not? (5)
Assess the evidence and if a grade is not provided give your opinions on grade using Academy’s EAL grading system? (5)
How would this evidence contribute to your practice in working with this population? (5)
Site Sources – AMA citation style preferred; individual studies pulled for brief should be cited (3)
Grammar/editing- (5)
Readability- Information conveyed in a clear and concise manner (5)
PICO Question Example:Is supplemental Vitamin D effective in reducing depression in an adult population.

P: adults

I: Vitamin D supplements

C: placebo

O: decreased rates of depression

****Research Brief Format: *****

Name of Systematic Review
Background/History
PICO Question:
Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria:
Methods
Results
PICO Question Answered:
P:

I:

C:

O:

Grade of Evidence:
Use of this evidence for nutrition professionals:
(I have attached 2 articles but feel free to choose only one article.)

You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes.

Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages.

Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor.

The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument.

Scroll to Top